Immigration BLOG

Visa Waiver Program Expansion Fact Sheet

By admin

The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) enables eligible citizens or nationals of certain countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa. The program is administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and was recently expanded to include seven new allies to the list of countries authorized to participate in the VWP.

U.S. reviving ‘86 amnesty program

By admin

By Hernán Rozemberg - Express-News

Attempts to create an amnesty-with-penalty program may have failed in Washington last year, but the government has been offering a belated pardon to immigrants who tried to qualify for a program two decades ago and were either unfairly turned away or never received an answer.

A lawsuit alleging many unauthorized immigrants were left out of the 1986 amnesty was settled in September, and as a result, the federal government has agreed to dust off old files and take new applications.

The agency responsible for immigration benefits, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, declined comment but clarified that this is not a new amnesty program.

In a news release last week, CIS detailed the background of the case and noted the new application period starts Feb. 1 and extends through January 2010.

The settlement is the third of three longstanding lawsuits stemming from the 1986 amnesty, the Immigration Reform and Control Act signed by former President Ronald Reagan.

Four years ago, two other similar suits were also settled, eventually allowing about 2,000 unauthorized immigrants to earn legal status.

One of the lawyers suing the government in the latest suit said the compromise isn’t perfect, but he still claimed victory.

“It took 20 years, but we accomplished our goal,” said Robert Gibbs, a Seattle lawyer who took up the case pro bono at its inception, along with other firms and organizations. “It was always about giving people a fair chance to apply.”

It’s unknown how many actually qualify — the government didn’t provide an estimate, while Gibbs’ best guess is around 10,000.

They won’t be easy to find, considering the eligibility requirements.

In an ironic twist, applicants will have to prove they are here illegally. They must have entered the country legally on a temporary visa before 1982 and then remained illegally once their visas expired.

Applicants can’t have a criminal history — convictions for a felony or three misdemeanors immediately disqualify them.

They’ll also have to pay to reapply, $585 for those who were wrongly rejected, who must have originally applied between May 5, 1987, and May 4, 1988. Those that never applied but think they now qualify will have to pony up $1,130.

Fees will be waived for applicants who were never given a decision on their forms, though they’ll still have to pay $340 for a work card if their cases are approved now.

Despite daunting obstacles, Gibbs hopes immigrants will take advantage of the possibility to get legalized after living underground for more than two decades.

Though legalization is not guaranteed, under the terms of the settlement the government cannot deport them — even if their applications are declined.

“They’re part of our society,” said Gibbs, whose firm split a $1.8 million payment from the government with other lawyers and organizations. “They’ve got families. They’ve got jobs. Many even have graduate degrees and work for city and state governments.”

His biggest fear is that qualified candidates will prefer to linger in illegal status, hoping the incoming administration under Barack Obama will give them a better and clearer chance at legalization.

Mobilize Now - How Your Vote Impacts the Future of Immigration –By our own L. Batya Schwartz Ehrens.

By admin

With presidential and congressional elections looming around the corner.  Americans continue to debate, worry and wonder which candidates will best serve the changing needs of our nation.  Whereas most issues on the political table fall into neat, divided platters of foreign or domestic policy, the great immigration debate is unique in that it reflects–and will literally redefine–whao and what falls within U.S. borders.  The election outcome ultimately affects not only internal affairs, but also the global posture of this country.

Immigration lawyers play a key role as ambassadors, advocates, educators, lobbyists, therapists, friends, and, of course, pursuers of justice for their clients.  Today, however a new type of immigration debate has emerged and gained momentum as advocates of just immigration policies and proponents of increased national security struggle to balance this legacy of opportunity and hope with this county’s changing security needs.   ……….Read more click pdf file bat12.pdf

Test Post

By admin

Test PDF

Test Post

Current Notice May Be Interpreted as USCIS Granting Approval for Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence

By admin

READ PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

USCIS Clarifies Language in Form I-751 Transfer Notices Sent to Petitioners

By admin

Current Notice May Be Interpreted as USCIS Granting Approval for Petition to Remove Conditions on ResidenceWASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today it will revise language in transfer notices received by petitioners who filed a Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence. The current notice includes language that may cause petitioners to believe their cases have been approved.USCIS announced last month that it is revising filing instructions for Form I-751 to require filing at the California or Vermont Service Centers. Until the form instructions are revised, any petitions filed with the Nebraska and Texas Service Centers will be transferred to California and Vermont, respectively. When USCIS enters data at one service center and later transfers the case to another, a Transfer Notice is sent to the petitioner advising him or her that the case has been transferred for adjudication and that they will be notified of the final decision.The current transfer notice currently contains the following phrase: “CRI89 approved removal of conditions (I89).” That statement means that the biometric portion of the case has been successfully transferred; it does not, however, mean that the petition itself was approved.While USCIS is in the process of changing the language in the transfer notice, a substantial number of notices have already been mailed containing the potentially confusing statement. Any petitioner who may have received such a notice should be aware of the following:At the time the I-751 was transferred, USCIS had not yet adjudicated (approved or denied) the case;USCIS transferred the case to the Service Center listed on the notice for adjudication; andIf the petitioner has not received additional information from the California or Vermont Service Centers, USCIS has not yet adjudicated the case.Petitioners who have a specific question related to their I-751 petition should contact the National Customer Service Center at (800) 375-5283 for more information.

Expedited Processing Available for Certain Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Beneficiaries

By admin

Q: Why is expedited processing available for SSI beneficiaries?A: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently entered into a settlement agreement in a national class action, Kaplan, et al. v. Chertoff, et al., CV 06-5304. The suit was brought by non-U.S. citizens who had lost or who were about to lose their eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) based on a statutory seven-year limit, and who were unable to become naturalized U.S. citizens before the loss of SSI benefits.  Under the settlement agreement USCIS will expedite I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status) – commonly referred to as ‘green card’ applications – and N-400 (Application for Naturalization) of current or former Supplemental Security Income (SSI) beneficiaries if the application has been pending with USCIS for more than six months. Read More…………………… 

Immigration reform awaits next president

By admin

Regardless of party, winner faces uphill battle on divisive issue

Daniel Gonzalez
The Arizona Republic
Jun. 16, 2008 12:00 AM

The next president will inherit a broken immigration system.

With the number of illegal immigrants in the United States estimated at more than 12 million, he will remain under public pressure to take bold steps to deal with the issue. President Bush tried but failed in that effort when Congress did not pass comprehensive immigration reform that he supported.

Nowhere is the issue more pressing than in Arizona. The state’s portion of the U.S.-Mexican border remains the main gateway for illegal border crossings, which has led to about 1,000 migrant deaths here since 2003.

Read more………….

USCIS to Issue Two-Year Employment Authorization Documents

By admin

WASHINGTON— U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that beginning on June 30, 2008 it will issue Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) valid for two years.

The new two-year EAD is only available to individuals who have filed to become a lawful permanent resident (LPR) using a Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, and filed for employment authorization under Section 274.a.12(c)(9) of Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations (8 C.F.R.) but are unable to become an LPR because an immigrant visa number is not currently available.

USCIS will decide whether to renew an EAD for either a one or two year validity period based on the most recent Department of State Visa Bulletin. A link to these bulletins is available under the related links section of this page.

For applicants who have an available immigrant visa number and who are filing for employment authorization under 8 C.F.R. Section 274.a.12(c)(9), USCIS will continue to grant EADs that are valid for one-year. USCIS may issue a two-year renewal EAD if the applicant’s immigrant visa availability date retrogresses (when actual demand for visa numbers exceeds forecasted supply) after the Form I-485 is filed.

If an individual requests to replace an EAD that has not expired, USCIS will issue a replacement EAD that is valid through the same date as the previously issued EAD. However, if the previous EAD has expired, USCIS will process the request for a renewal EAD and determine the appropriate validity period based on the applicant’s priority date and the Department of State Visa Bulletin.

For more information on Employment Authorization Documents, please contact the USCIS National Customer Service Center at (800) 375-5283 or review the USCIS Employment Authorization Documents web page, found in the related links section of this page.

Read More………………

Immigration bill passes House, heads to governor by S.C. Politics Today

By admin


29 May 2008

 

 

Immigration bill passes House, heads to governor

 

 

In a vote of 94 to16, the House agreed Thursday to a Senate amended immigration reform bill.

The bill, which now heads to the governor, gives S.C. employers two options to ensure a potential employee is in the country legally. Employers must either check a potential worker’s Social Security number against a federal database or secure a copy of an employee’s drivers license. Read more……………………

Next »